Skip to content

Intercropping Safeguards Food Security and Cleans the Air

Abstract: Intensive monoculture agriculture requires massive synthetic nitrogen fertilization, driving agricultural ammonia (\(\text{NH}_3\)) emissions that react with atmospheric acids to form deadly fine particulate matter (\(\text{PM}_{2.5}\)). However, agricultural policies often treat crop yield maximization and environmental health as an unavoidable zero-sum trade-off. Here, we quantify the nationwide agro-environmental and public health co-benefits of adopting strip intercropping (maize-soybean) across China using an integrated agronomic, chemical transport, and health impact model. We find that replacing intensive maize and soybean monocultures with intercropping enhances total grain production by \(1.5–3.2\%\) while reducing synthetic nitrogen fertilizer usage by up to \(13.5\%\). This fertilizer reduction decreases annual agricultural \(\text{NH}_3\) emissions by \(0.46\text{ Tg N}\), lowering population-weighted surface \(\text{PM}_{2.5}\) by \(1.2–2.5\ \mu\text{g m}^{-3}\) and preventing over \(7,000\) air pollution-related premature mortalities annually. These results demonstrate that agro-ecological crop diversification provides a powerful, simultaneous solution for global food security, climate resilience, and public health.

"We do not need to choose between feeding a growing population and breathing clean air: planting complementary crops side-by-side unlocks natural ecological synergies that achieve both."


1. The Hidden Cost of Monoculture & The Fertilizer Dilemma

To sustain modern food demand, global agriculture applies over \(110\text{ million tonnes}\) of synthetic nitrogen fertilizer each year. In East Asia, heavy fertilization has achieved high crop yields, but at a severe environmental cost:

  1. Low Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE): More than \(50\%\) of applied nitrogen is lost to the environment rather than absorbed by the crop[^1].
  2. Ammonia Volatilization: Excess soil ammonium volatilizes into atmospheric ammonia gas (\(\text{NH}_3\)).
  3. Secondary \(\text{PM}_{2.5}\) Smog Formation: In the atmosphere, basic \(\text{NH}_3\) rapidly neutralizes nitric acid (\(\text{HNO}_3\)) and sulfuric acid (\(\text{H}_2\text{SO}_4\)) from industrial and vehicular emissions, forming ammonium nitrate (\(\text{NH}_4\text{NO}_3\)) and ammonium sulfate (\((\text{NH}_4)_2\text{SO}_4\)) aerosols—the dominant inorganic components of wintertime \(\text{PM}_{2.5}\) air pollution in East Asia and the US Midwest[^2].
flowchart LR
    Fertilizer["Synthetic N Fertilizer (Urea / Ammonium)"] --> SoilN["Excess Soil Ammonium (NH4+)"]
    SoilN --> Volatilization["Agricultural NH3 Volatilization"]
    Volatilization --> Atmosphere["Atmospheric Gas Phase NH3"]
    Atmosphere --> Reaction{"Neutralization Reactions with Acid Gases"}
    AcidGas["Industrial & Vehicular NOx and SO2 (HNO3, H2SO4)"] --> Reaction
    Reaction --> PM25["Secondary Inorganic PM2.5 (NH4NO3, (NH4)2SO4)"]
    PM25 --> Health["Premature Respiratory & Cardiovascular Mortalities"]

    style Fertilizer fill:#b91c1c,stroke:#ef4444,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style Volatilization fill:#f97316,stroke:#ea580c,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style Reaction fill:#3b82f6,stroke:#1d4ed8,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style PM25 fill:#7f1d1d,stroke:#991b1b,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff
    style Health fill:#450a0a,stroke:#7f1d1d,stroke-width:2px,color:#fff

2. What Is Strip Intercropping?

Strip intercropping is an agro-ecological practice where two or more compatible crops (typically a cereal such as maize and a legume such as soybean or peanut) are cultivated in alternating parallel strips in the same field during the same growing season:

                      Strip Intercropping Architecture
       Row 1-2: Maize (Zea mays)             Row 3-4: Soybean (Glycine max)
             (Tall C4 Grass)                       (Short C3 Legume)
                  ▲                                      ▲
                 ┌┴┐                                    ┌┴┐
                 │ │                                    │ │
                 │ │  High Canopy Sunlight              │ │  Rhizobia Nitrogen Fixation
                 │ │  Captures Upper Radiation          │ │  Biological N₂ → NH₄⁺
                ─┴─┴─                                  ─┴─┴─
                 \ /    Deep Root System                \ /    Lateral Nodulated Roots
                  ▼     Taps Subsoil Water & N           ▼     Mobilizes Soil Phosphorus

The Three Ecological Mechanisms:

  1. Biological Nitrogen Fixation: Legumes form symbiotic relationships with root-nodule Rhizobium bacteria that fix inert atmospheric \(\text{N}_2\) into bioavailable ammonium, drastically cutting synthetic fertilizer requirements[^3].
  2. Niche Differentiation & Complementarity: Maize has a deep taproot and tall canopy (capturing upper canopy sunlight); soybean has a lateral shallow root system and shade tolerance (utilizing diffuse ground light).
  3. Interspecific Facilitation: Maize root exudates stimulate organic acid secretion that mobilizes insoluble soil phosphorus, benefiting both crops.

The net biological productivity of intercropping is measured by the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER):

\[\text{LER} = \frac{Y_{\text{maize, inter}}}{Y_{\text{maize, mono}}} + \frac{Y_{\text{soy, inter}}}{Y_{\text{soy, mono}}}\]

An \(\text{LER} > 1.0\) (typically \(1.2–1.4\) in field trials) indicates that a monoculture would require \(20–40\%\) more land area to produce the same total grain yield.


3. Modeling Nationwide Agro-Environmental & Health Co-Benefits

In our paper published in Environmental Research Letters[^4], we coupled empirical agronomic field trial data across China with the global 3D chemical transport model GEOS-Chem and epidemiological concentration-response functions to simulate a nationwide transition to maize-soybean intercropping:

[Agronomic Field Trials (Yield & Fertilizer Savings)] ──► [GEOS-Chem 3D Chemical Transport Model] ──► [Global Burden of Disease Health Model]

Quantitative Findings across China:

Metric Monoculture Baseline Nationwide Intercropping Adoption Co-Benefit Shift
National Maize Production \(215.8\text{ Mt}\) \(+5.2\text{ Mt}\) \(+2.4\%\) grain increase
National Soybean Production \(12.9\text{ Mt}\) \(+1.4\text{ Mt}\) \(+10.8\%\) grain increase
Synthetic Nitrogen Application \(10.4\text{ Tg N yr}^{-1}\) \(9.0\text{ Tg N yr}^{-1}\) \(-13.5\%\) fertilizer cut
Agricultural \(\text{NH}_3\) Emissions \(3.45\text{ Tg N yr}^{-1}\) \(2.99\text{ Tg N yr}^{-1}\) \(-0.46\text{ Tg N yr}^{-1}\) reduction
Surface \(\text{PM}_{2.5}\) (North China Plain) \(68.4\ \mu\text{g m}^{-3}\) \(66.1\ \mu\text{g m}^{-3}\) \(-2.3\ \mu\text{g m}^{-3}\) cleaner air
Annual Prevented Premature Deaths \(7,100\) lives saved per year

4. Interactive Policy Simulator: Agricultural Intercropping Impact

Adjust the regional adoption rate of strip intercropping to evaluate the simultaneous gains in grain harvest, fertilizer cost savings, and avoided \(\text{PM}_{2.5}\) mortality:

🌾 National Intercropping Scenario Calculator

Total Grain Boost
+3.3 Mt
Synthetic N Cut
-0.70 Tg N
NH₃ Emissions Slashed
-230 kt N
Avoided Deaths / Year
~3,550 lives
At 50% adoption, intercropping produces substantial public health benefits while bolstering domestic protein feed security through expanded soybean output.

5. Policy Implications for Global Sustainable Development

The findings of this work provide crucial evidence for achieving several UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 2: Zero Hunger, SDG 3: Good Health and Well-being, and SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production):

  1. Beyond Single-Sector Thinking: Agricultural policy, environmental protection, and public health are traditionally managed by separate government ministries. Our work shows that cross-sectoral interventions in farm field design can deliver outsized air quality benefits that industrial emission controls alone cannot achieve.
  2. Smallholder Scalability: Strip intercropping can be implemented using modern mechanized harvesters and requires minimal initial capital investment compared to high-tech carbon capture or end-of-pipe industrial scrubbers.

Data and Code Availability

  • Atmospheric Model: Chemical transport simulations were performed using the open-source GEOS-Chem Chemical Transport Model[^5].
  • Agronomic Datasets: Field trial yield and nitrogen response databases are archived in the Environmental Research Letters repository.
  • Analysis Code: Geospatial mapping and health burden calculation scripts are open source on GitHub: kamingfung/intercropping-air-quality.

References

[^1]: Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743 [^2]: Paulot, F. & Jacob, D. J. Hidden cost of U.S. agricultural exports: particulate matter from ammonia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 903–908 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/es4034793 [^3]: Li, L. et al. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11192–11196 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704591104 [^4]: Fung, K. M., Tai, A. P. K., Yong, T., Liu, X. & Lam, H.-M. Co-benefits of intercropping as a sustainable farming method for safeguarding both food security and air quality. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 044011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab0c79 [^5]: Bey, I. et al. Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 106, 23073–23095 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807